Written rules in formal organizations are distinctive elements of organizational history; they shape organizational change and are in turn shaped by it. These rules are created, revised, and eliminated in ways that leave historical traces, and they have a visibility and durability that elude non-written rules. They thus provide rich data for an empirical probe into the dynamics...(展开全部)

Written rules in formal organizations are distinctive elements of organizational history; they shape organizational change and are in turn shaped by it. These rules are created, revised, and eliminated in ways that leave historical traces, and they have a visibility and durability that elude non-written rules. They thus provide rich data for an empirical probe into the dynamics...(展开全部)

Written rules in formal organizations are distinctive elements of organizational history; they shape organizational change and are in turn shaped by it. These rules are created, revised, and eliminated in ways that leave historical traces, and they have a visibility and durability that elude non-written rules. They thus provide rich data for an empirical probe into the dynamics...(展开全部)

Written rules in formal organizations are distinctive elements of organizational history; they shape organizational change and are in turn shaped by it. These rules are created, revised, and eliminated in ways that leave historical traces, and they have a visibility and durability that elude non-written rules. They thus provide rich data for an empirical probe into the dynamics...(展开全部)

亨利·伯恩斯坦，英国伦敦大学亚非学院发展研究系著名教授。

When, how, and why did the state enterprise system of modern China take shape? The conventional argument is that China borrowed its economic system and development strategy wholesale from the Soviet Union in the 1950s. In an important new interpretation, Morris Bian shows instead that the basic institutional arrangement of state-owned enterprise - bureaucratic governance, manag...(展开全部)

When, how, and why did the state enterprise system of modern China take shape? The conventional argument is that China borrowed its economic system and development strategy wholesale from the Soviet Union in the 1950s. In an important new interpretation, Morris Bian shows instead that the basic institutional arrangement of state-owned enterprise - bureaucratic governance, manag...(展开全部)

詹姆斯·G·马奇（James G.March），斯坦福大学的管理学弗莱德.H·梅芮尔教授，以及政治学和社会学教授。他除了于专业期刊上发表多篇论文外，还在组织与行为学领域出版了九部专著。 约翰·P·奥尔森（Johan P.Olsen），挪威卑尔根大学的政治学教授，他出版过九部专著，并在众多学术研究协会和政治组织中担任顾问。

詹姆斯·G·马奇（James G.March），斯坦福大学的管理学弗莱德.H·梅芮尔教授，以及政治学和社会学教授。他除了于专业期刊上发表多篇论文外，还在组织与行为学领域出版了九部专著。 约翰·P·奥尔森（Johan P.Olsen），挪威卑尔根大学的政治学教授，他出版过九部专著，并在众多学术研究协会和政治组织中担任顾问。

The first complete translation of China's earliest and most influential monastic code.